documentation:why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm
=>  Releases

Current version
Git/Snapshot: 1.5.3
Release: 1.5.0

Latest Snapshots
Produced after each commit or rebase to new upstream version

GIT
RSBAC source code, can be unstable sometimes

=>  Events

No events planned

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
documentation:why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm [2005/09/20 09:50]
127.0.0.1 (old revision restored)
documentation:why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm [2006/05/02 15:40] (current)
Line 73: Line 73:
  
 I believe all this hurts the Linux project and makes it depend even more on commercial or political decisions of one single country - it should have been a Linux solution after all. In any case, I am going to continue work on RSBAC in the way I believe to be right and appropriate. If you think it should be different, convince me and we are back at the previous sentence... I believe all this hurts the Linux project and makes it depend even more on commercial or political decisions of one single country - it should have been a Linux solution after all. In any case, I am going to continue work on RSBAC in the way I believe to be right and appropriate. If you think it should be different, convince me and we are back at the previous sentence...
 +
 +====== Update April 2006 ======
 +It seems that LSM is about to be removed from the official kernel and SELinux allowed to have their individual hooks. Reason: All other LSM users live outside the official tree. Now I wonder why they have been outside the tree for so long.
 +
 +Amon Ott.
//
documentation/why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm.txt · Last modified: 2006/05/02 15:40 (external edit)

documentation/why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm.txt · Last modified: 2006/05/02 15:40 (external edit)
This website is kindly hosted by m-privacy