documentation:why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm
Releases
Current version
Git/Latestdiff: 1.5.6
Latest Snapshots
Produced after each commit or rebase to new upstream version
GIT
RSBAC source code, can be unstable sometimes
Events
No events planned
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
documentation:why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm [2005/09/20 09:50] 127.0.0.1 (old revision restored) |
documentation:why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm [2006/05/02 15:40] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
| I believe all this hurts the Linux project and makes it depend even more on commercial or political decisions of one single country - it should have been a Linux solution after all. In any case, I am going to continue work on RSBAC in the way I believe to be right and appropriate. If you think it should be different, convince me and we are back at the previous sentence... | I believe all this hurts the Linux project and makes it depend even more on commercial or political decisions of one single country - it should have been a Linux solution after all. In any case, I am going to continue work on RSBAC in the way I believe to be right and appropriate. If you think it should be different, convince me and we are back at the previous sentence... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Update April 2006 ====== | ||
| + | It seems that LSM is about to be removed from the official kernel and SELinux allowed to have their individual hooks. Reason: All other LSM users live outside the official tree. Now I wonder why they have been outside the tree for so long. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Amon Ott. | ||
documentation/why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm.1127202619.txt.gz · Last modified: 2006/05/02 15:40 (external edit)